How would a court typically categorize an administrative decision made without proper reliance on the law?

An administrative decision made without proper reliance on the law would typically be categorized as arbitrary or capricious. This designation suggests that the decision lacks a reasonable basis or is excessively whimsical. Courts look for consistency with legal principles and requirements when reviewing administrative actions.

If an agency fails to adhere to established legal standards or acts outside its jurisdiction, its actions may be deemed arbitrary, meaning there is no rational connection between the facts presented and the decision made. Similarly, the term "capricious" implies that the decision appears to be made on a whim rather than through careful and thoughtful consideration of relevant laws and regulations.

In summary, labeling a decision as arbitrary or capricious indicates that it does not demonstrate a proper application of legal standards, leading to a lack of legitimacy and justification.