What doctrine requires a plaintiff to prove a specific duty owed by a municipality?

The Home Rule doctrine empowers municipalities to govern themselves and make decisions tailored to their specific needs and circumstances, including the establishment of certain responsibilities and duties. In the context of a legal situation where a plaintiff seeks to hold a municipality accountable, Home Rule is particularly relevant because it outlines the framework under which local governments operate and the specific duties they owe to their citizens.

When a plaintiff claims an injury or loss, they must demonstrate that the municipality had a specific duty towards them, as defined by this doctrine. This principle underscores the recognition that local entities may have unique regulations or duties that differ from those of higher levels of government.

By contrast, the other doctrines listed do not specifically focus on the requirement of proving a duty owed by a municipality in the same way. Public Interest Doctrine generally pertains to the government's obligation to act in the public's interest but does not necessarily establish specific duties for municipalities. Governmental Immunity refers to the protection governmental entities have against certain lawsuits, while the Inherent Discretion Doctrine involves the discretion that officials have in performing their duties but does not directly address the requirement to prove a specific duty owed.