What kind of enforcement issue arises from alleging that one is being unfairly targeted compared to others?

Discriminatory enforcement refers to a situation where individuals or groups believe they are being targeted for enforcement actions based on biased factors such as race, religion, or economic status, rather than on objective criteria or consistent application of the law. This concept is critical in maintaining fair enforcement practices and ensuring that all individuals are treated equally under the law.

In cases of alleged discriminatory enforcement, the claim is often centered on the idea that certain individuals are being singled out for scrutiny or penalties while others who may be engaging in similar behavior are not facing the same enforcement actions. This leads to concerns about fairness and justice within the enforcement process.

Differential treatment and selective prosecution are related concepts but focus more specifically on how individuals within similar circumstances are treated differently or how some individuals are prosecuted while others are not. These terms may be part of the broader conversation about discriminatory enforcement but do not capture the full essence of targeting based on perceived bias. Unequal accountability suggests a lack of responsibility among some parties compared to others, but it does not specifically address the mechanisms of how laws are enforced in a biased manner. The core focus on bias and targeting aligns closely with the definition of discriminatory enforcement, making it the correct choice.